Friday, June 5, 2009

Media is So Far Right that Obama's Pandering to the Right is Seen as Socialism


Wake Up America, the Media Treat Far-Right Views as Mainstream

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 9:55 AM on June 4, 2009.


This dynamic produces "a deep and largely unconscious conservative bias in the media's discussion of policy."


E.J. Dionne Jr. has a very interesting column today that notes the media's "tilt to the right."

"Yes, you read that correctly: If you doubt that there is a conservative inclination in the media, consider which arguments you hear regularly and which you don't. When Rush Limbaugh sneezes or Newt Gingrich tweets, their views ricochet from the Internet to cable television and into the traditional media. It is remarkable how successful they are in setting what passes for the news agenda.

The power of the Limbaugh-Gingrich axis means that Obama is regularly cast as somewhere on the far left end of a truncated political spectrum. He's the guy who nominates a "racist" to the Supreme Court (though Gingrich retreated from the word yesterday), wants to weaken America's defenses against terrorism and is proposing a massive government takeover of the private economy. [...]

Democrats are complicit in building up Gingrich and Limbaugh as the main spokesmen for the Republican Party, since Obama polls so much better than either of them. But the media play an independent role by regularly treating far-right views as mainstream positions and by largely ignoring critiques of Obama that come from elected officials on the left."

Exactly. If far-right voices are characterized as mainstream, it shifts the center of political gravity. For all the talk about media adulation of the president, this dynamic produces "a deep and largely unconscious conservative bias in the media's discussion of policy. The range of acceptable opinion runs from the moderate left to the far right."

Single-payer healthcare is considered beyond the realm of reasonable discourse. So is the notion of reducing military spending. The idea of raising taxes to improve the budget outlook is characterized as ridiculous.

At the same time, there is ample media discussion over whether the administration's fairly centrist economic policies and the president's moderate instincts can reasonably be described as "socialism."

Dionne concludes with a very compelling point that bears repeating: "Democrats love to think that Limbaugh and Gingrich are weakening the conservative side. But guess what? By dragging the media to the right, Rush and Newt are winning."

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."





2 comments:

  1. When are you and others going to realize the media is not right wing. Come on, MSNBC? CNN? ABC? CBS? NBC? LA Times? other major media? These are right wing? No.

    You forget that even though the media has left, yes left leaning, that is secondary to their #1 priority. Ratings. They will also push, distory, manipulate, and use anything and everything to create a story. That will be tempered by their left lean but never forget ratings/attention will always be priority #1.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The media appears left of your perspective but far right of mine and most others. The media just follows the major players and driven by corporate interests, political self-interest, corporate power and their own take of the world. Congress has shifted right of corporations who are right of center. Liberalism is on the left side of Congress. Conservatism remains on the right side of Congress and the far right merges with fascism. The populace is now slightly left of center.

    Elitists (conservative or liberal), fascists, empire builders (political, media or corporate) have little genuine populist concerns and do not represent real change. They represent special, narrow and limited interests.

    ReplyDelete